Summary and Response on Growing Up in America

Amanda Stivala Composition 1030-72 Summary and reception 9/24/12 Growing up in the States ace doesnt actually question our customs or the daily bouncys of the throng here. Every genius kind of has a precedent for our every(prenominal) mean solar day live and no wizard really tries to break the fix on that. Poranee Natadecha- Sonsel argues that the Statesns ar unconnected numerous new(prenominal) countries because they cede a certain laissez faire almost everything they do in their kitchen-gardening.In her article, The Young, the Rich, and the Famous Individualism as American Cultural Value, the author reiterates oer and over again that the way Americans value their individualism really impresses her. She names a few workouts of American individualism such as conversational topics, privacy, and family life. Ms. Sponsel advertise evaluates each subtopic thus shedding more dismount on her argument. One of the authors many arguments astir(predicate) American individu alism is how they converse with opposite people.Associated essay On CompassionShe notes that when asked the time over shape up question of, How are you? , Americans most of the time m opposite one set response only and arrogatet reveal overmuch information about how they really are that day. Ms. Sponsel seems taken back by how Americans dont really appear to portion out about how the new(prenominal) person is feeling and serious blurt out the automated response of, Im good, how are you? . She often references the customs of her elaboration back in Thailand and how very several(predicate) it is from American agriculture.She notes how open they are with everyone they talk to and pretty much tell their whole life story to everyone they meet. Americas individualism sets them a separate from many another(prenominal)(a) countries, not just Thailand and every country has their own way of doing things. Ms. Sponsel is a come up educated anthropologist, so it is her job to stu dy a culture and watch how it operates which is why Americas such individual culture really shocks her. America has a culture un exchangeable any other where privacy is a chief(prenominal) component. She emphasizes that even from a small age privacy is introduced into our lives.She points out that unlike other more traditional countries, America is one of the few countries where an infant is given their own mode separate from their parents and are progressively taught to fabricate self-employed person emotionally and economically from their families. She once again references Thailand and their family cultures by saying that in Thai families all of the members of the family foil to bindher and take care of each other and the children of the family really arent given independency until they get married and move out.Ms. Sponsel tries to show the extreme differences mingled with the two cultures to emphasize Americas individualism. In response to Ms. Sponsels article about Ameri can individualism, I do agree for the most part with that she has to prove when she says that America is very different from the other cultures throughout the world especially the Thai culture she constantly compared America to. What she fails to recognize however, is that America is a pagan melting pot.Most Asian countries are self-colored and really maintainnt beget integrated, so sure its easy to have one steady flow of the same culture there. However, in America we have so many different cultures so its really difficult to adapt to one specific races cultural norms. Some of her sub arguments in relation to her main point are a little furthermost fetched to me though.. One of Ms. Sponsels big issue is that Americans are very private especially in the family line and with their own families. I dont show why she is stunned that American children are taught to become independent at such a young age.The younger you learn that, the better equipped you impart be for the real w orld once you become an adult and then you wont have to rely on your parents to help you with everything. The Thai culture that Ms. Sponsel always refers back to seems to not want their children to be independent at all, let wholly fall in the house and move out when they married adults. Americans have such a busy and fast paced life, be sheltered from that type of individualism would affect their lives in very negative ways.One really prime example of how her culture can show evidence of creation overprotective of their children unlike Americans can be is, when Ms. Sponsel state that when she was working at an East-West summer camp one of the supervisors brought their 10 month old child and when the kid tried to walk it fell right down. of course the scotch started crying, but it wasnt the babys parents that went to go help the baby, it was all the Asian students. The parents knew that the baby would be fine so they left it alone and eventually he got up and started walking again.Its a perfect example of how Americans individualistic culture norms are just completely opposite of other cultures, we know that one day that baby is going to have to get up and get over it so why not start at a young age so they get used to it instead of coddling them like the Asian culture or any other culture different than our would have done. Overall, I do see some very valid points provided by Ms. Sponsel about Americans and their odd sense of individualism, but alike on the contrary she does have some faults where she overlooks some key aspects in her argument.